Touche, Curtis! B)
Like I said my friend, hard to argue. 👿 Our disagreeing is not so bad, IMO. As we have seen time and time again here, this usually leads to more experiments. :woohoo:
I don’t question the pictured results of the Verhoeven, but I do question certain parameters of the methods. Clay’s pictures are certainly harder to argue, still! I’ve got theories I’m wrapping my head around….
Some further criteria to perhaps think about – what about the effects of broken in stones vs. new ones? Loaded vs. clean ones? Pressure vs. none? Films vs. stones/plates vs. compounds – they all have different concentrations and cutting depths.
Then mix them all up and take some pictures :silly:
.
.