Advanced Search

1500 Stones, Old vs New?

Recent Forums Main Forum Techniques and Sharpening Strategies 1500 Stones, Old vs New?

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #52805
    NorCalQ
    Participant
    • Topics: 54
    • Replies: 149

    Is there any difference between the 1500 stones that I got a year or so ago and the new 1500 stones?  I’m sure the new 1500>2200>3000 progression works great, but will my old model 1500 stones fit in place of the new or do I need to purchase them again, in new form?  I’d hate think that all wear aside, all 1500 stones would not be created equal.

    #52806
    Marc H
    Moderator
    • Topics: 81
    • Replies: 2755

    I too have the 1,500, 2,200 and 3,000 grit stones, as well as lapping film and strops. In fact, I have a lot of DLF inventory that I’m very little use out of. The 2200/3000 grit stones don’t seem to produce the polish I got with my well-worn 1500’s, but microphotos suggest that the scratch patterns are correct. so I’ve been using them.

    This is my opinion based on my personal observations and my user experiences: The older 1500 grit stones owned by Michael Blakely and Frans are the originally released 1500/glass blank combo, stone set. I have two of these older stones and two of the more recently released, (this past year) newer 1500 grit stones. The older stones in my user experience are finer behaving and give a more polished result then the newer same named stones. The older, first produced and sold, 1500 grit stones also appear finer then the new 2200/3000 grit in my user experience and my observed results after using them all and comparing the bevels visually with a USB Microscope. As well as the newest 1500/2200/3000 grits do work and fit together in that new progression. I don’t believe the 2200/3000 grit stones will lend anything enhancing to the progression after the two year old 1500 grit diamond stones. For the older 1500 grit stones the next step in that progression, IMO, is diamond lapping films if your looking for finer grit stones, or, possible the ceramic stones, (I have little experience with the ceramics) and then finish with the strops.

    Marc
    (MarcH's Rack-Its)

    #52809
    NorCalQ
    Participant
    • Topics: 54
    • Replies: 149

    Would then, the older 1500 stones fit somewhere between or after the new 1500>2200>3000 stones?

    #52818
    NorCalQ
    Participant
    • Topics: 54
    • Replies: 149

    Has Clay given any feedback on the issue of new vs old 1500 stones?  I’m wondering, if they do give the same size scratch patterns, then why would the old give a better “polish” than the new?

    #52845
    Mr.Wizard
    Participant
    • Topics: 6
    • Replies: 190

    This is going to be difficult to handle in the next revision of my grit chart.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.