Advanced Search

Scrubbing or alternating single direction strokes?

Recent Forums Main Forum Techniques and Sharpening Strategies Basic Techniques and Sharpening Strategies Scrubbing or alternating single direction strokes?

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 25 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #9079
    Rocco Sanello
    Participant
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 13

    Looking for a little clarification. In Clay’s introductory video, he goes from the 100 through the 1000 grit paddles (I think) with alternating single direction strokes. While checking out a few random wicked edge YouTube videos, I noticed a lot of “scrubbing”. It seems pretty easy to create a burr with the scrubbing motion. Is there a reason to use one method over the other? Should I do alternating strokes with everything except the ceramics? Should I use scrubbing through the first few grits to get a burr on the other side then switch to alternating single direction strokes towards the finer grits? You guys never let me down. Thanks.

    – Rocco

    #9080
    Mark76
    Participant
    • Topics: 179
    • Replies: 2760

    It doesn’t really matter IMHO. When scrubbing you generally use a bit more power, so it may be more appropriate for the first grit, when you are trying to raise a bevel. An advantage of the sweeping motion is that you generally cover the whole edge in one go, so you don’t run the risk of doing one part of the edge more than other parts. (Although you do need to be careful: when using a sweeping motion it is easy to “forget” the tip.) Also, when you alternate your sweeps, so generally don’t raise a burr on one side anymore.

    Molecule Polishing: my blog about sharpening with the Wicked Edge

    #9082
    cbwx34
    Participant
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 1505

    Looking for a little clarification. In Clay’s introductory video, he goes from the 100 through the 1000 grit paddles (I think) with alternating single direction strokes. While checking out a few random wicked edge YouTube videos, I noticed a lot of “scrubbing”. It seems pretty easy to create a burr with the scrubbing motion. Is there a reason to use one method over the other? Should I do alternating strokes with everything except the ceramics? Should I use scrubbing through the first few grits to get a burr on the other side then switch to alternating single direction strokes towards the finer grits? You guys never let me down. Thanks.

    – Rocco

    I usually use a scrubbing motion if I detect a problem area on a knife, otherwise I just use the alternating strokes. If you use a scrubbing motion to raise a burr, you only need to do it once (per side), not “through the first few grits”. I’m curious why you think you do alternating strokes with “everything except the ceramics”? Not sure what that means.

    #9090
    Rocco Sanello
    Participant
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 13

    Hey Curtis (I think that’s your name cbwx),
    The only reason I brought up “except ceramics” was purely out of not knowing. I was just bringing up different scenarios. Is there a minimum or maximum number of alternating strokes per side I should keep in mind? I realize it probably depends on the function of the knife and type of steel, but is there a loose rule of thumb I should stick to? Or should I instead just base it on what I see through the lupe?

    #9091
    Josh
    Participant
    • Topics: 89
    • Replies: 1672

    In my opinion it doesn’t matter which you do as long as you get rid of all the prior scratches. The “scrubbing” just seems to do this faster. I normally just scrub for a short period on each grit and then finish that grit with alternating sweeping passes, finishing with a light touch. The problem with scrubbing only is that you will wear away different parts of your edges of at different rates. The problem with sweeping is that the angle does change slightly near the tip due to the play in between the paddles and the rod. So just check it often under magnification 🙂 hope this helps!

    #9094
    blacksheep25
    Participant
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 68

    If I’m trying to evenly remove material, I’ll make scratches in one direction, then come back and cross hatch it. When I’m re-profiling I use the scrubbing back and fourth (and sometimes side to side). On the final finish, I’ll usually cut in the same direction you’d strop (away from the edge).

    #9097
    Mark76
    Participant
    • Topics: 179
    • Replies: 2760

    Is there a minimum or maximum number of alternating strokes per side I should keep in mind? I realize it probably depends on the function of the knife and type of steel, but is there a loose rule of thumb I should stick to? Or should I instead just base it on what I see through the lupe?

    Any experienced sharpener will tell you “it depends”, “listen to the stones”, “it’s Zen”, etc. However, when I just started sharpening I didn’t know what stones sounded like, how to check whether scratches had been wiped out, … Then Leo told me: first raise a burr on both sides of the edge (with the 100 grit stones), with subsequent stones do 50 strokes per side. That was very helpful.

    That said, if you have a loupe, it can aid in making your learning curve flatter. Examine the edge after every stone and you’ll quickly get an idea of whether you are there already or not yet.

    Molecule Polishing: my blog about sharpening with the Wicked Edge

    #9108
    Phil Pasteur
    Participant
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 944

    As Mark said, 50 is a good rule of thumb… at least for grits to 600. I go more with the finer grits for scratch removal. If I got all of the way to my 12K stones, for the last few (5K, 10K, 12K) I may do 125. 100 edge trailing, and 25 or so edge leading.

    As Mark also says, “it depends”, on where I am trying to get to. Perfection takes more strokes…

    I guess my ZEN is dead. I can tell differences in feel and sound, only up to a point. If I aim for max scratch removal and a mirror bevel, I use numbers and magnification. I simply can’t tell the difference in sound and feel between very sharp and quite reflective and virtually scratch (visibly) free and a mirror bevel. Interestingly, lots of the Zen guys, still use magnification to check how well the “force” has done at the edge.:evil:

    All of that said, you will get a nice sharp blade if you do 50 strokes per side at all grits…and save lots of time..
    🙂

    Scrubbing, well I typically only use that for agressive material removal. After a burr on both sides…once per side, I will only use brisk up and down strokes for a while alternating sides, for scratch removal,when changing grits, then move to sweeping strokes alternating sides. After 1000 grit, I just use sweeping strokes. I do the same with the ceramics, BTW.

    Too much scrubbing and you will violate the laws of conservation of steel.. !!

    Phil

    #9115
    Geocyclist
    Participant
    • Topics: 25
    • Replies: 524

    I agree with what everyone above has said. I always try to use “light” pressure with my stones. I can “feel” when one grit is done. At this point I put even more focus for 10-20 stroke to go even lighter, almost no pressure at all then, go to the next grit.

    #9117
    Mark76
    Participant
    • Topics: 179
    • Replies: 2760

    Phil,

    I guess we agree on a lot of things. I am a scientist by education and (former) profession, so I really like to know what exactly is going on and I use a loupe and a microscope quite often.

    However, another part of the fun for me is the Zen part. Other people may meditate, but I’m simply too energetic for that and cannot sit still for a long time without a purpose. But at least when I sharpen a knife, I have a purpose. And then the activity of sharpening makes me relax. Now I know how to sharpen a knife, I can do it pretty much without thinking. And it’s very relaxing. That’s also what I love about sharpening.

    Molecule Polishing: my blog about sharpening with the Wicked Edge

    #9126
    cbwx34
    Participant
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 1505

    I guess my ZEN is dead. I can tell differences in feel and sound, only up to a point.

    That made me smile. 😛

    I really don’t think it’s a “Zen” thing though… if you pay attention to the sound/feel, the change is definitely there. I think characterizing it as “Zen”, might make some think it’s not an actual occurrence. But you make a good point… actually looking and seeing what is going on is probably more accurate.

    #9131
    Geocyclist
    Participant
    • Topics: 25
    • Replies: 524

    The “feel” is important. Not only can you sort of tell when a stone is finished, and ready to move on, but you can also feel when the stone is off (bad stroke) or you have a section of the blade that isn’t quite right, needs more work, etc.

    For example, I do all strokes tip to heel, edge trailing. For stones 600 and below I do some edge leading strokes in middle of each stone to clean up any burr. You can “feel” the difference right away on the first 4 strokes when I switch to edge leading, then the next 4 are much smoother. Going back to edge trailing the first few stokes I can feel the stone cutting more, then it gets smoother again.

    IMHO, I think tactile feedback and sound (hearing) are equally if not more important than sight when it comes to sharpening. With the WE once you set everything up and get the bevels/angles right it is more about sound and feel than sight. (since the blade never moves and the angles don’t change). I am not suggesting you sharpen blind folded by any means.

    I have to give kudos to the WE for the excellent tactile feedback. I didn’t get this with other systems.

    At the same time the WE design eliminates a lot of variances in other systems, so even if you can’t “feel” the stone you can still get a great edge with the WE.

    #9132
    Phil Pasteur
    Participant
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 944

    The “feel” is important. Not only can you sort of tell when a stone is finished, and ready to move on, but you can also feel when the stone is off (bad stroke) or you have a section of the blade that isn’t quite right, needs more work, etc.

    I agree, feel gets one in the ball park… The problem is, when someone is learning and asks for a number of strokes, it does not tell them what they need to know by telling them to feel it. Feel, I think is developed over time. Even when you can feel it… this is very relataive. I don’t feel things the same way you do, nor does anyone else. Feel is something that is hard, if not impossible to define or teach, especially via text communication. It is highly subjective and personal.

    As I mentioned, I can feel and hear differences to a point. But I cannot feel, especially with the finer stones or strops, the difference between very good and nearly perfect.

    Now the OP asked for number of strokes to use at first. If he was an accomplished sharpener that could feel it, he likely would not have to ask that question.

    Maybe I am just jealous because my ZEN is so darn elusive to contact… or so limited that I cannot detect the level of differences that I need for the reults that I want…
    🙁

    Phil

    #9141
    cbwx34
    Participant
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 1505

    The problem is, when someone is learning and asks for a number of strokes, it does not tell them what they need to know by telling them to feel it.

    Good point!!!

    #9148
    Geocyclist
    Participant
    • Topics: 25
    • Replies: 524

    I agree, sorry I missed the original question. 50 per side sounds about right.

    For a count I guess it boils down doing too many or too few. If you too many it doesn’t really hurt anything. (unless you do a thousand strokes then our just grinding your blade away). Too few and the next stone won’t work as efficiently. After each stone I wipe the blade clean with a paper towel and inspect. I am looking to see smaller scratches and a smoother edge.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 25 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.