Advanced Search

Leading or Trailing Strokes

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 55 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #4863
    cbwx34
    Participant
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 1505

    Funny you should mention that – I was just working on it this morning and modified my jig to allow the blade to sit up vertically under the scope. It’s hard to find the edge but once I do, I can focus on it fairly well. I did some measurements and got and edge thickness of between .45um and .29um with the Mirco-Fine .6 stones at 28 degrees.

    Cool. These would be interesting to see as well.

    It might be worth mentioning… this may be old news to those who have been involved in sharpening for a while, but if you’re new you might not know this… that there is some debate over which method leaves a better edge, trailing or leading. There is differences in the type of burr formed, how the burr is removed and the edge it leaves, whether or not edge leading “smashes” the edge into the abrasive particles preventing it from ever getting sharp, and other factors. Many sharpeners base their whole method on these ideas, and while most seem to make common sense (on either side of the issue), little has been done to actually prove or disprove the “facts”. So, while it’s hard to draw conclusions from just a few photos, over time, this could prove to be very beneficial. B)

    #4864
    wickededge
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 123
    • Replies: 2938

    Hey Ralph,

    I have the sharpener set at 25 degrees for the .6um and 30 for the for the roo strops.

    Clay, What angle did you use to clean up the edge with the ‘roo and then what angle did you use with the 0.6um micro-fine ceramics?

    Thanks,

    Ralph

    -Clay

    #4865
    Ralph Honeycutt
    Participant
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 24

    Clay, For some reason I was expecting the opposite. With the roo strops at 30 deg, would it not roll the edge over? … and with the 0.6um at 25 deg, I would have expected it to cut somewhere on the shoulder and not the edge. I think I am missing something.

    Thanks,

    Ralph

    #4867
    wickededge
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 123
    • Replies: 2938

    Ralph, you’re right I just goofed up my answer. I stropped with the roo at 25 and used the .6 ceramics at 30! Thanks for catching it.

    Clay, For some reason I was expecting the opposite. With the roo strops at 30 deg, would it not roll the edge over? … and with the 0.6um at 25 deg, I would have expected it to cut somewhere on the shoulder and not the edge. I think I am missing something.

    Thanks,

    Ralph

    -Clay

    #8179
    Geocyclist
    Participant
    • Topics: 25
    • Replies: 524

    Bumping this up. Have some questions here (actually searched the forum rather than starting a new thread).

    1.) Does anyone have feedback on best performance (sharpness, edge quality) of leading vs. trailing.

    2.) Does anyone do both leading and trailing? I was trying 5 each, then finishing 1 each way. After looking at Clay’s photos, would alternating leading/trailing stokes clean up the burr on the bevel and the edge?

    3.) Feedback on direction – tip to heel or vice versa? Do you roll the tip less by going tip to heel? (or do I just need more practice?) I did find the mixing tip => heel and heel => tip seems very rough, like going against the grain. Or is this good? Does switching directions get the scratches out or just make more/worse?

    #8187
    cbwx34
    Participant
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 1505

    Bumping this up. Have some questions here (actually searched the forum rather than starting a new thread).

    1.) Does anyone have feedback on best performance (sharpness, edge quality) of leading vs. trailing.

    2.) Does anyone do both leading and trailing? I was trying 5 each, then finishing 1 each way. After looking at Clay’s photos, would alternating leading/trailing stokes clean up the burr on the bevel and the edge?

    3.) Feedback on direction – tip to heel or vice versa? Do you roll the tip less by going tip to heel? (or do I just need more practice?) I did find the mixing tip => heel and heel => tip seems very rough, like going against the grain. Or is this good? Does switching directions get the scratches out or just make more/worse?

    Here’s my .02

    1. On some knives I can’t tell. On knives that I have an issue with… primarily a burr that won’t go away, edge leading works best for me at cleaning it up. If I’m trying to get a knife as sharp as I can, I find edge leading, especially with the ceramics, gives me a better edge.

    2. On the WE I primarily do edge trailing. I never do edge leading with the coarse stones.

    3. With the coarse stones I do heel to tip, seems to be the quickest way to set up the edge. From 600g on, I’ll do heel to tip, then I’ll do 10-20 strokes tip to heel before moving to the next stone. With the finest stone or strop I plan to finish with, the majority are tip to heel. Switching cleans up the bevel better, and finishing tip to heel sets the “teeth” for better slicing. Even with a polished finish, I see a difference. (All this is edge trailing).

    Not set in stone “rules”, just a general pattern I tend to follow on the WE.

    #8270
    Gary Crumb
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 119

    I tried your technique with my CRKT Ripple and I have to say, it’s probably the sharpest blade I’ve done so far. I also now have the upgraded ball arms and paid special attention to keeping pressure very light. Still, it was able to shave facial hair in relative comfort, and other hair was no issue whatsoever! I shouldn’t have changed so many variables at once to get a better idea of what is making the greatest difference, but it has to be the combination of all. Light touch is key. I’m now a believer.

    #8271
    Geocyclist
    Participant
    • Topics: 25
    • Replies: 524

    cbwx34, why do you not do edge leading with coarse stones?

    I noticed an improvement on my last knife by doing both heel to tip and tip to heel, finishing each stone with tip to heel. I can feel/tell I am working the scratches out. The sharpness was better also.

    For a re-profile I do scrubbing strokes to get a burr with 100# stones. Then from there its alternating strokes.

    #8272
    Geocyclist
    Participant
    • Topics: 25
    • Replies: 524

    cbwx34, why do you not do edge leading with coarse stones?

    I noticed an improvement on my last knife by doing both heel to tip and tip to heel, finishing each stone with tip to heel. I can feel/tell I am working the scratches out. The sharpness was better also.

    For a re-profile I do scrubbing strokes to get a burr with 100# stones. Then from there its alternating strokes.

    #8273
    Phil Pasteur
    Participant
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 944

    I know you were asking Curtis. I can just throw in how I do things and why I do not alternate at lower grit levels.
    I run through all of the stones until about the 3K Choseras.. including (today anyway) the WEPS ceramics edge trailing. In the past I have done everything edge trailing. Not sure I can get anything any sharper…

    Lately with the real fine stones I have been doing … depending on OCD level, about 100 strokes edge trailing, 30 or so edge leading and a few edge trailing. The dge leading strokes at the higher grits can get rid of the very fine scratches a bit faster… but not so much that I worry about it… nor can I see it without lots of magnification. So… why? Because it is easier for me to do with the level of coordination that I possess. I can control the paddles consistently better… I think, being consistent is as important as anything that I do while sharpening. Muscle memory is very important in getting there.

    Some folks have said that they can cut some things better by angling the scratch pattern toward the heel,,
    I think they are talking about lower grits. I have a knife prepped up to the 5K choseras… I will go to 10K and a bit of stropping. Then, as Clay suggested increase the angle by a degree and go down to the 1200 cermaics. Usually I would just do this edge trailing… because that is what I do. Maybe I can do that.. do some tests, and go back and try edge leading for a few strokes. See if I find any improvement. If I do, maybe I work a new wrinkle into my progression.

    I think,if you feel you are getting blades sharper with one direction over the other, it could be the direction that you leave the “tooth” pattern. For a couple of years and lots of knives …hair whittling, hair tree topping, rope parting from 2 inches away (not really :)) I am not sure that I can improve sharpness results from the primarily edge trailing method… though cosmetically I have seen faster scratch removal by alternating..

    Bottom line, why do I do it that way… because I am comfortable with it and it works for me… I get great results.

    Of course, as always, do what works for you.. It is always great ot hear what others do to get good results!
    🙂

    Phil

    #8275
    Geocyclist
    Participant
    • Topics: 25
    • Replies: 524

    Thanks Phil,

    I understand the coordination thing myself. I started out thinking I should go with edge trailing since I have to use it for stropping it would improve my coordination for stropping and help eliminate nicking the strops. But then I started wondering if there was any advantage or disadvantage to either direction.

    I was wondering if there was any negative result with edge leading that caused people to avoid it, such as leaving a burr or wire edge.

    #8278
    cbwx34
    Participant
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 1505

    cbwx34, why do you not do edge leading with coarse stones?

    I noticed an improvement on my last knife by doing both heel to tip and tip to heel, finishing each stone with tip to heel. I can feel/tell I am working the scratches out. The sharpness was better also.

    For a re-profile I do scrubbing strokes to get a burr with 100# stones. Then from there its alternating strokes.

    I don’t think it matters alot, but I feel it leaves a better edge for the finer stones, not having really coarse particles running into the edge. On the finer stones, it doesn’t seem to make as much difference. I probably should have said “rarely” not “never” and added a bit more… for example if trying to do a re-profile, some major work or repair, scrubbing up and down is a good method.

    #8280
    Michael Lingard
    Participant
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 33

    This is an interesting topic.

    I’ve recently been reading some stuff on the Spyderco forum where Cliff Stamp was really speaking against any kind of trailing edge strokes and also stropping in general. He was saying something about stropping and edge trailing strokes just push the metal back and forth and fatigue the edge causing a loss in edge retention. This confused me because from my own limited experience, I seem to have better edge retention since getting my WEPS and adding stropping to the finishing step in my sharpening routine.

    It’s sometimes hard to sift out the truth when so many seemingly experienced knife people can have directly opposing viewpoints on how to achieve the best edge…

    #8281
    wickededge
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 123
    • Replies: 2938

    It’s sometimes hard to sift out the truth when so many seemingly experienced knife people can have directly opposing viewpoints on how to achieve the best edge…

    Ain’t that the truth! Most of the knowledge base in the field is based on anecdote, which doesn’t mean it’s necessarily incorrect, but a lot of it has not been tested rigorously with controlled variables.

    -Clay

    #8282
    Geocyclist
    Participant
    • Topics: 25
    • Replies: 524

    Calling Clay…….

    I read the entire post here. Sound like edge trailing creates a better edge (as in smoother), by using very light pressure the “burr” or slop on the bevel is minimized. Using strops this is cleaned up. Is it accurate to say the better edge comes from edge trailing?

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 55 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.