3D printed Custom handles
- This topic has 6 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 12/16/2023 at 5:48 am by
.
-
a Lot of the parts im waiting on come in this weekend so ill start spamming post updates of the progress next weekish
1 user thanked author for this post.
Sorry I’m late on this one, but here’s one tidbit I have to share:
If the long bore diameter is larger than the rod diameter, you’ll want rods which are extra long. If you slide the handle high enough to have the rod drop out of the upper bushing, you’ll see some angular error and if the bushing are a tight fit, you’ll see some binding between the rod and lower bushing.
I’m currently using a design in which there is no bore or bushing. The two halves are flat, with 1/4″ spacers on each side of the rod. The spacers are attached to the two halves with double-faced tape. The side-to-side tolerance is irrelevant. Imagine the halves are 3/4″ wide and the spacers are 3/16″ wide and attached so that their outboard edges line up with the sides of the two halves. That leaves a channel 1/8″ wider than the rod diameter. No precision required as side-to-side movement doesn’t effect angular accuracy. The thickness of the two layers of double-faced tape allow just enough clearance for the rod to move freely in the channel. If you don’t follow, consider that I don’t have a round bore for the rod. I have a slot. The rod can move sideways in the slot but not relative to the stone faces. You only need accuracy in the axis perpendicular to the stone faces. Not side-to-side.
For stone-to-stone uniformity, invest your efforts in the repeatability of the distance between stone face and the flat back. Generally, a 0.010″ error will result in a 1/1oth degree error in accuracy. I cut my spacers from a 0.250″ thick slab of ABS using a table saw.
1 user thanked author for this post.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.