This is getting off the subject of the original post’s subject, but it fits in with the present discussion. I don’t chose a grit determined by the amount of steel I think I need to remove. That is, more steel has to go so start with a coarser grit. I choose the grit based on the results I’m getting working on that steel. The hardness of the steel is more a determiner of the grit I use than the amount of metal I have to remove. I start most knives, including a reprofile at usually 500 grit whetstones or 400 grit if using diamond stones. (Touch-ups I try to start at 1000 grit.) I’m attempting to make as fine and shallow a scratch pattern as I can while removing steel and still get good results. I’m reshaping or reprofiling the knife by removing thin layers of metal across the knife where needed. This is compared to cutting or scratching a deep groove with the lower coarser grits, then having to remove all the metal surrounding it to get even to the depth of the groove with subsequent finer/higher grits.
I work with this grit choice for awhile to gauge the progress I’m making. If I’m working too hard, that is having to apply too much pressure and having to use too many strokes then I step down to the next lower grit and continue from there. If I find that’s working I’m good to go. If I find again, I’m working too hard, I step down again to the next lower grit. So my grit choice is the result of a subjective decision not a plan from the onset.
2 users thanked author for this post.