I think there are too many factors at play here to make anything more than a subjective opinion. I usually carry two knives; one smaller knife, sharpened as sharp as I can make it, stropped nightly and used for light duty cutting (envelopes, fruit etc.)
The second knife is usually either a Strider fixed blade, or one of several Emerson folders. These knives are generally taken to 800 grit, then stropped, and finished with a micro bevel (only a few passes, mind you) of the 800 stones offset 2 degrees from the original bevel, to restore a slight tooth to the edge. It’s this knife that gets the “grunt” work…cutting zip-ties, breaking down boxes, general digging, prying, stripping wires, that sort of thing. It will get a light stropping at night, but not anything too extensive. I usually wait until it’s showing signs of actual dulling before going back with the stones.
Since I rotate through about 10 knives for this role currently, I seldom carry one “hard use” knife more than a couple of days in succession, so it takes a while (as a general rule, about every third rotation for the knife, or roughly a month)
I sort of prefer the “two knife” approach since I can be pretty confident that regardless of the job I’m tackling, I’ll almost always have the right knife, and I will usually have the right knife sharpened properly for the task at hand.
I don’t think you can discount the medium you’re cutting, the frequency you cut it, nor where you cut it. Although when I’m at work I still carry two knives, the smaller folder gets used much more often for fear of intimidating someone with a larger knife, so at times it “seems” like the smaller, sharper knife dulls more quickly. I think it does also due to the concentration of forces on the edge multiplied by the frequency it’s used.
Apples vs. oranges…and then a highly subjective answer results anyway