RLDubbya
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
08/23/2017 at 5:20 am #40798
Good stuff, Clay – thanks!
I spent some time thinking about this yesterday as I was going through the same customer’s bag-o-knives. I picked out a couple to work on for him next; and I thought that it would be a good idea to do before/after pics so that I could post them on my website and show people some of what I do. That certainly dovetails with Clay’s observation, above, about taking pics for documentation purposes.
The thing I came up with yesterday was implementing a “not to exceed” charge. The customer in question, for example, has some knives that really are not too bad in terms of dirt, etc, and the cleaning charge will be quite low. At the same time, there is an Old Timer which is pretty bad; for example, the gut hook is completely filled and clogged with guts, making it unuseable until some effort is put into place cleaning it. I don’t have any issue at all with using a garden hose and then a compressed air hose on a sub-$30 fixed blade prior to sharpening. This approach would result in me investing about 3 minutes into the knife.
However, a full custom knife with a gut hook that is filled and clogged with guts is a different story: since the handle is wood, finished to somebody’s spec, and the blade (think tang) will rust, I’m not comfortable blasting with water and potentially ruining the knife. I would want to clean such a knife by hand, which means a lot more time.
Then we can consider the blade material. Suppose that we have a non-stainless tool steel, like a D2; and that we’ve tossed the knife into a bag after the last day in the field when we’re back at base. The knife then gets moved to it’s travel bag, tossed into the plane, and then when we arrive home, it’s tossed into the back of the cabinet in the garage. After sitting there for 5 months, it’s suddenly remembered, and Bob is called to clean and sharpen.
We’re going to have a higher charge for this case.
I also think it’s pretty much impossible to estimate the cost up front; the customer might want the blade to be all shiny and new; if it’s something like S35V, that will happen pretty quickly. A non-stainless blade might take a lot more time, effort, and Simichrome. So rather than worry about quoting up front, I’m thinking that I should just do this on an hourly basis, and set the hourly rate high enough that my cost for supplies is covered to prevent the appearance of “nickel and diming” the customer.
The observation re: taxes is a good one; for now, I’d like to just take the easy way out and just write off the different polishes, etc., as company expenses. That’s a conversation to have with the accountant – oh be still, my beating heart!
Freebies: I thought that a good freebie would be a lanyard, and I tried that for this customer. The reasons I think it’s good: one, it’s useful (at least to some people) and it’s a physical object. As a physical object, users can see it, hold it, and be reminded that I made the lanyard for them as part of sharpening – so it’s a built-in reminder that I sharpened the knife. Ultimately – and this will take some time – I’d like to include a bead or a tag with the company name and contact info.
When I was first starting my technology consulting in ’93, somebody offered me this advice: always charge something for every piece of work you do. If you do not, customers will expect that work to be performed gratis in the future.
As somebody with advanced terminal cancer, there will be dark days when I complain about things you say for no apparent reason. Please consider this my apology in advance for such times. There will be days that what I say is clearly wrong, making no sense: on these days I will often be argumentative. Please do not "let me slide" at such times, but rather call me out, point out what is factually wrong, and demand I explain my position. Please also consider this my apology in advance for such times.
2 users thanked author for this post.
08/21/2017 at 3:16 pm #40777I agree with the customer knowing up front, absolutely a requirement. In this case, however, the customer is a pretty good friend, and If I didn’t charge him, he would just do something like tape a $20 bill to my front door at night and let me puzzle it out. But definitely a lesson learned!
As somebody with advanced terminal cancer, there will be dark days when I complain about things you say for no apparent reason. Please consider this my apology in advance for such times. There will be days that what I say is clearly wrong, making no sense: on these days I will often be argumentative. Please do not "let me slide" at such times, but rather call me out, point out what is factually wrong, and demand I explain my position. Please also consider this my apology in advance for such times.
08/17/2017 at 10:04 am #40687Bob, you are all over the map with your descriptions here. How can you do horizontal scrubbing with DLF ? It would rip it up or at the least wear out the DLF surface very quickly.
Bob is actually onto something here. I often use horizontal strokes and sometimes scrub horizontally with the lapping films. It doesn’t tear them but you need to have something you can adjust on the rod, like a stop collar, to keep the stone in the same position for a period until the film loads up, then move the stop (I just use a rubber band) up a little to work on a fresh section of the film. It works great for polishing but is not good for the edge, so I only do it when I’m planning on either a micro-bevel or finishing with perpendicular strokes on my final DLF grit.
Clay, maybe that’s a huge difference in my approach: I switched my mindset from viewing the use of DLF as an exercise in sharpening to that of being an exercise in polishing.
As with all mindsets, generalizations, and abstractions there will be exceptions. However, one of the specific fallouts from my mindset change is that your observation of horizontal scrubbing being bad for edges elicits a “So what – it makes the edge look better” from me. Ultimately, I think, I will have to deal with combining the two perspectives: maybe I’ll end up using 75% less horizontal scrubbing, finding that it gives me 80% of an improvement in looks, and only negatively impacts the edge by 10%. If I instead use 90% horizontal scrubbing, I might get an 85% improvement in looks, but a negative impact to the edge of 75%.
But I have to start somewhere.
As somebody with advanced terminal cancer, there will be dark days when I complain about things you say for no apparent reason. Please consider this my apology in advance for such times. There will be days that what I say is clearly wrong, making no sense: on these days I will often be argumentative. Please do not "let me slide" at such times, but rather call me out, point out what is factually wrong, and demand I explain my position. Please also consider this my apology in advance for such times.
08/17/2017 at 12:15 am #40671Bob, you are all over the map with your descriptions here. How can you do horizontal scrubbing with DLF ? It would rip it up or at the least wear out the DLF surface very quickly.
Well, crap. No wonder I have NOT worn out a single piece of DLF, nor ripped it up, after having done, mmmmm, 17 knives using it. I’d better stop doing this.
I’m guessing with your experience, you know more about this than me. Can I ask you how many knives you have used this technique on, and what your usage stats from your log are like? You must keep detailed logs, right?
As somebody with advanced terminal cancer, there will be dark days when I complain about things you say for no apparent reason. Please consider this my apology in advance for such times. There will be days that what I say is clearly wrong, making no sense: on these days I will often be argumentative. Please do not "let me slide" at such times, but rather call me out, point out what is factually wrong, and demand I explain my position. Please also consider this my apology in advance for such times.
08/16/2017 at 9:13 pm #40656My Manix Lightweight S110V was one of the first knives I sharpened, and I thought it was a piece of cake – incredibly easy to get close to a mirror edge on it, and I could “treetop” arm hair with it. Big difference, I think: no water stones. The blade needed reprofiled on the belly forward to the tip. I accomplished the setup with notes for the angle gauge, the reprofile, the sharpening, and the polishing in about 15 minutes.
Reprofile work was done with 100 grit diamond.
Sharpening sequence was 100-200-400-600-800 stones. I alternated edge leading and edge trailing so that I could debug as needed.
After 800, I knocked off the burr, and started a new sequence: 1000-1500 stones, 50 strokes each, no scrubbing.
Then I moved to DLF, and used the 9 micron, for about 50 strokes, and then switched to some horizontal scrubbing, light pressure – basically dividing the blade up visually, and scrubbing from heel to tip and back again, while slowly moving the stone up.
I then switched to stropping. I’m still working on my stropping progressions, but I have this overall plan: start with a diamond paste in the 6-12 micron range, and a “hard” paddle (think something like cereal box on metal paddles). Then we’re going to manipulate a couple variables: surface firmness and grit size, until we get to our final grit/surface/angle adjust combo, which might be something like .1 micron / cow leather / -1.5 degrees.
Along the way, we might discover that this sequence:
3 micron / hard / no change
1 micron / medium / no change
.5 micron / soft-medium / -.5 degree
.25 micron / soft / -1 degree
.1 micron / soft/ -1.5 degreeWhere we can get the hard-med-soft surface from:
Hard: metal (glass) with cereal box strip
Medium: nanocloth
soft-medium: balsa
soft: cow leather / roo leatherI’m working on these progressions now, in fact, just so that I have standards to follow and avoid random creep.
Hope that helps, or gives you some ideas.
Bob
As somebody with advanced terminal cancer, there will be dark days when I complain about things you say for no apparent reason. Please consider this my apology in advance for such times. There will be days that what I say is clearly wrong, making no sense: on these days I will often be argumentative. Please do not "let me slide" at such times, but rather call me out, point out what is factually wrong, and demand I explain my position. Please also consider this my apology in advance for such times.
08/16/2017 at 8:21 pm #40654Errrmmm…field dressing “a couple hundred elk” even in 10 years seems a bit crazy. Yeah, just a little! Amazing work.
The guide told me a couple things: he had switched over to the surgical scalpels initially because of not being able to get a good, reliable sharpener. He could use the scalpel and just switch blades when one got dull. He also did / does this with an “Exchange-A-Blade” system. Hopefully we can get him back to using his customs. He has one nice Siggma
As somebody with advanced terminal cancer, there will be dark days when I complain about things you say for no apparent reason. Please consider this my apology in advance for such times. There will be days that what I say is clearly wrong, making no sense: on these days I will often be argumentative. Please do not "let me slide" at such times, but rather call me out, point out what is factually wrong, and demand I explain my position. Please also consider this my apology in advance for such times.
1 user thanked author for this post.
08/16/2017 at 1:20 pm #40638I’m trying to understand all this as well. I just received a grocery sack full of custom fixed blades from a big game guide who is my next door neighbor (well, he’s the closest neighbor at just a bit over 1/2 mile away). He left for a sheep hunt in North BC Saturday, and wanted 4 knives sharpened by then; 2 were the same.
I put a mirror edge on one of those two, and worked on sharpness technique with the other. We’ll see which one he likes best.
In talking with him a bit, he almost never carries a knife on his hunts. He now carries a surgical scalpel with replaceable blades. He just cannot find anybody who can put a good edge on his stuff. I was flattered that he trusted me enough to let me play. I’m pretty certain the WEPS blew him away; hopefully he will continue to use me.
As somebody with advanced terminal cancer, there will be dark days when I complain about things you say for no apparent reason. Please consider this my apology in advance for such times. There will be days that what I say is clearly wrong, making no sense: on these days I will often be argumentative. Please do not "let me slide" at such times, but rather call me out, point out what is factually wrong, and demand I explain my position. Please also consider this my apology in advance for such times.
2 users thanked author for this post.
08/13/2017 at 8:13 pm #40606Fair enough. Just to be clear: in what follows, I’m neither trying to justify what I posted, nor argue for a particular position. I am only laying where I’m coming from out in front of the group, no more, no less.
In my experience – I was involved in a lot of facets of IT since 1986, including at one point from 99-01 sysmodding a forum with an average post count of 300,000 posts per month – if we don’t debate ideas, and back up those ideas with facts, we pretty quickly lose the thread. I’ve seen many discussions of security especially go nowhere precisely because people are unwilling to confront the hard ideas and work through the difficult questions. I’ve seen many companies lose quite a bit of money because their foundation is built on half-truths; I saw one company paying over $120k in IT support costs when they were down 40% of the time; when their computers and software were years out of date; when their “IT Guy” was only charging them $30/hr. They were floored when I reorganized their operation, and got their support costs down to $20k/year, with new hardware every 2 years, and I was charging $150/hr.
There is a right way and a wrong way. The right way is characterized by open challenging of ideas and mutual respect.
I, too, care quite a bit about the WE company and products. When there was a call by Chris to discuss ideas about the forum, I was very enthused. I (perhaps too enthusiastically) laid out some of my ideas and opinions. That’s all. I actually am quite glad that Mark76 challenged those ideas – in my opinion, that sort of challenge and response cannot be replaced. It’s fair to say that I think more highly of Mark76 for doing just that, for through the open expression of disagreement about old ideas, new & better ideas are born in my experience.
I certainly don’t think I’m better than anybody else posting on this forum. I think we are all equals. I also think it would be a mistake to discourage the open and honest exchange of ideas in any way. That strikes me as antithetical not only to the development of new ideas about the subject matter, but absolutely antithetical to the entire concept of a message board designed to encourage communication.
However, I will abide by the conclusions that some of you have reached, and I will keep my hole shut in the public areas of this forum as a necessary step I should take in keeping the peace. Not a problem at all, and thank you for bringing this to my attention.
Sincerely, and with respect,
RLDubbya
PS One last thing before I shut up: I’m off to sharpen some custom knives for a big game guide!
As somebody with advanced terminal cancer, there will be dark days when I complain about things you say for no apparent reason. Please consider this my apology in advance for such times. There will be days that what I say is clearly wrong, making no sense: on these days I will often be argumentative. Please do not "let me slide" at such times, but rather call me out, point out what is factually wrong, and demand I explain my position. Please also consider this my apology in advance for such times.
08/13/2017 at 4:26 pm #40600Ryan, you’re welcome, and please let us know how it goes for you!
As somebody with advanced terminal cancer, there will be dark days when I complain about things you say for no apparent reason. Please consider this my apology in advance for such times. There will be days that what I say is clearly wrong, making no sense: on these days I will often be argumentative. Please do not "let me slide" at such times, but rather call me out, point out what is factually wrong, and demand I explain my position. Please also consider this my apology in advance for such times.
08/13/2017 at 3:48 pm #40598I do apologize. I thought when the developer – whom I respect greatly – posted the following:
I’ve created this new sub-forum (Suggestion Box | Forum Usability) so we can discuss various items that would improve forum usability. Please also post your suggestions and questions here.
We’d love to hear your thoughts on things that would make the forums easier/better.That rather meant that he would like to hear my thoughts on what would, in fact, make the forums easier/better.
Forgive me, I am new to your planet; I am sure that I will soon enough understand the finer points of your language.
As somebody with advanced terminal cancer, there will be dark days when I complain about things you say for no apparent reason. Please consider this my apology in advance for such times. There will be days that what I say is clearly wrong, making no sense: on these days I will often be argumentative. Please do not "let me slide" at such times, but rather call me out, point out what is factually wrong, and demand I explain my position. Please also consider this my apology in advance for such times.
1 user thanked author for this post.
08/13/2017 at 12:16 pm #40595I beg to disagree, Bob. I find this forum now one of the most user-friendly fora I know. There have been crashes in the past, but those were due to implementation issues or hosting problems. I do agree that it might have been cheaper to use dedicated forum-only software, although I have no insight in the prices.
What are the specific problems you have with this forum software? The thing you mention is its security. I think this is no different for WordPress than for most other web-based software. My WordPress blogs are stable as a rock and have never been successfully attacked. Also, we now have much better spam control than with the previous forum.Mark,
You beg to disagree with what? I made quite a few assertions in my post. I will, given your lack of specificity, assume that we are going to talk a bit about security. I will dispense with anecdotal reports after this: I had 400 sites in our data center; about 70 of those were WordPress. Oftentimes they had been compromised, and remained compromised, without the owners knowing that fact until I notified them that my tools were seeing network traffic indicative of malware originating from their server.
Here’s an example of a publicly disclosed vulnerability, reported on June 30, 2017. A company was working on a stats plug-in; according to them:
“Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
WordPress Vulnerablity Disclosre
SQL Injection Vulnerability in WP Statistics
JUNE 30, 2017JOHN CASTROESPANOLPORTUGUESSecurity Risk: Dangerous
Exploitation Level: Easy/Remote
DREAD Score: 7/10
Vulnerability: SQL Injection
Patched Version: 12.0.8
As part of a vulnerability research project for our Sucuri Firewall, we have been auditing popular open source projects looking for security issues.While working on the WordPress plugin WP Statistics, we discovered a SQL Injection vulnerability. This plugin is currently installed on 300,000+ websites.
Are You at Risk?
This vulnerability is caused by the lack of sanitization in user provided data. An attacker with at least a subscriber account could leak sensitive data and under the right circumstances/configurations compromise your WordPress installation.
If you have a vulnerable version installed and your site allows user registration, you are definitely at risk.”
This illustrates the nature of the problems with WP quite nicely. While a core build may or may not be OK, the plug-ins – something that WordPress leverages in a way no other software does – add a layer of vulnerability.
OWASP additionally states: “There is a long list of recommended resources for securing aspects of the WordPress implementation.” The OWASP guide points out, rightly, that not only does a good security posture include the WordPress core, all plug-ins, the infrastructure, Apache, but it also includes mySQL, PHP – and these lists are quite long as well.
IN short: creating and maintaining a proper security posture for WordPress is quite difficult. For example, this plug-in might be compromised now; however, the malware might only be monitoring transactions, and unless there is a solid pre-emptive plan, the malware may be running unopposed.
The CVE database lists 1,114 security flaws in WordPress.
The CVE database lists 87 security flaws in vBulletin.That strikes me as a substantial gap between platforms.
As far as problems I’m having: well, I cannot format text in the editor. I think the user i/f is non-intuitive to the point of insanity. I routinely pick the wrong elements in the UIX for what I wish to do. I have never had that problem with vBulletin or XenFora.
Not knowing much about it, and not willing to learn it – that’s above my pay grade – I don’t know what is being done for SEO. For example, tags are not automatically filled in as far as I can tell. I have not, to the best of my knowledge, been provided with any suggestions for tagging so that SEO efforts are optimized. Are permalinks automatically created in SEO-friendly methods?
SPAM should not be handled by forum software, but by anti-spam software and/or hardware.
These are just my quick observations of higher priority issues.
YMMV,
BobW
EDIT so the link is not live: haaaattp://www.helltownknives.comI apparently hit another bug: if I link to a website as I did above, I’m not sure what happens aside from it crashing Chrome on the iPad.
Another feature that is not great – and I have seen other people mention it – private messaging.
As somebody with advanced terminal cancer, there will be dark days when I complain about things you say for no apparent reason. Please consider this my apology in advance for such times. There will be days that what I say is clearly wrong, making no sense: on these days I will often be argumentative. Please do not "let me slide" at such times, but rather call me out, point out what is factually wrong, and demand I explain my position. Please also consider this my apology in advance for such times.
08/12/2017 at 1:50 pm #40583So I’m about to sharpen an Emerson Chisel and would like some basic instructions on how to do this? Not sure how to begin. (I’m surmising I just sharpen like a typical V grind only just do it on the one side? Start with a sharpie on the one side and then go through the progression of grits etc?)
Yes, that’s what I’ve been doing. Since I only have the one Emerson on which to practice, it’s quickly getting to the point where it sees me coming and I swear I hear a little voice whimper “Oh dear god not tonight I’ve a headache.” Essentially, depending on condition of the beveled side, I’ll start with diamond 100-200-400; obviously the more the damage, the lower the grit. Then I follow a standard progression on the diamond stones, up to either 1000 or 1500.
Here’s where it gets interesting, in my opinion. I have, as the pics I posted somewhere show, made the bevel very wide – my idea was to do a wide bevel, and then try various experiments to get a high polish. That will achieve, according to my brain, a couple things: one, the standard show-off factor of “Mirror mirror on the bevel, who is the master of the universe?” type thing; secondly, given that the width acts something like a magnifying lens, I can see fairly quickly what methods produce the most / least scratches. This has its drawbacks as well, because the bevel is always wide, and any flaws are hugely visible.
With that said: I’ve had some luck taking the diamonds up to 1,000, then switching to the MF ceramic: coarse, then fine. Then balsa wood or nano-cloth, using a .5-.25-.1 micron sequence; I’m finding that I like the nano-cloth quite a bit at this stage. No need to fiddle with angles at this point, I want something fairly hard and unforgiving. I’ll hit anywhere from 50-200 strokes, depending on how the bevel surface looks.<span style=”color: #ff6600;”>*</span>
After that, I hit the WE leather strop – .25-.1 micron sequence – at least 100 strokes, and take the time to watch the surface carefully. You will also have to adjust your angle a bit as per normal stropping protocol.
The other sequence I’ve used with great success after the diamond stones 800-1000-1500 is to skip ceramics altogether, and use balsa wood or nano-cloth strops, in a sequence something like 5-3-2-1-.5-.25-.1<span style=”color: #ff0000;”>**</span> micron. I’ve experimented and discovered that if I do the .25-.1 sequence on a nano-cloth belt using the WorkSharp as a belt grinder/polisher, I quickly draw out a fantastic mirror edge. When you’re done with this stage, strop as per above.
<span style=”color: #ff6600;”>*You probably know this, but: I’ve found it critically important to examine the edge in a variety of lighting conditions. The best one for making the edge look bad is a darkened room, and a bright Red LED flashlight. The scratch pattern really jumps out for evaluation.</span>
<span style=”color: #ff0000;”>**I’m sure you can eliminate one or more of the 5-3-2-1 micron steps</span>
Then: I have tried to knock off the burr on the backside using a couple methods. First, just a manual strop, smooth leather loaded with a bit of 1 micron paste; I use a hanging strop with smooth leather and linen. I hit about 10 strokes on the leather, with the strop pulled quite tight and using ample pressure. I follow this up with 2 or 3 strokes on the plain linen.
That seems to work, for the most part, OK. Sometimes I have trouble getting the entire burr knocked off, so I’m trying a new technique: I use a nano-cloth or balsa wood WE strop, loaded with 1 micron paste (not much paste at all), and adjust the WEPS for the smallest angle it can manage against the backside. I strop about 10 strokes, using what I would call a pressure of “4” on a scale of 1-10, with 1 being just enough pressure to control the paddle, and 10 being enough pressure so as to require placing my other palm down on the WEPS base, and putting all my weight on it (granted, I’m light at 265lbs) to keep it from flipping over.
Hope that helps.
As somebody with advanced terminal cancer, there will be dark days when I complain about things you say for no apparent reason. Please consider this my apology in advance for such times. There will be days that what I say is clearly wrong, making no sense: on these days I will often be argumentative. Please do not "let me slide" at such times, but rather call me out, point out what is factually wrong, and demand I explain my position. Please also consider this my apology in advance for such times.
07/31/2017 at 10:51 pm #40422Identify and control the variables while systematically changing one thing at a time to learn its impact on your sharpening process.
As somebody with advanced terminal cancer, there will be dark days when I complain about things you say for no apparent reason. Please consider this my apology in advance for such times. There will be days that what I say is clearly wrong, making no sense: on these days I will often be argumentative. Please do not "let me slide" at such times, but rather call me out, point out what is factually wrong, and demand I explain my position. Please also consider this my apology in advance for such times.
5 users thanked author for this post.
07/25/2017 at 3:14 pm #40339Wow! Excellent work, gentlemen. That is really great – and it sounds like not only did the YouTube Expert change his mind – no small feat – but that he will also do the right thing, and inform his viewership of all this.
As somebody with advanced terminal cancer, there will be dark days when I complain about things you say for no apparent reason. Please consider this my apology in advance for such times. There will be days that what I say is clearly wrong, making no sense: on these days I will often be argumentative. Please do not "let me slide" at such times, but rather call me out, point out what is factually wrong, and demand I explain my position. Please also consider this my apology in advance for such times.
1 user thanked author for this post.
07/25/2017 at 2:53 pm #40337It is most likely Simple Green. I had no issue with any of my stones, until I wash them with SG. Upon washing my 1500/glass paddles, I had the glass come off. Once it’s dry, I just stick the glass back onto the double sided tape on the paddle and it’s good as new. Using soapy water is a common trick used in the application of stickers. It allows the sticky side to slide freely until you squeeze the soapy water off. Given the application I think it’s behaving properly, but I could be wrong.
I think that has to be it; I noticed in the cleaning thread that Clay was going to try SG, but he did not post any follow-up. I should have asked – there’s no real harm done, except I think that I might have to replace the tape at some point.
I hope anybody who is thinking of using SG for either sharpening or cleaning sees this thread first. Might as well save somebody the surprise.
I’ve found time to sharpen one knife today, which had a couple small chips in the cutting edge. I started with 400, and am just now ready to use the 1500. I have been using a mixture of water, a little bit of Dawn, and a little bit of Windex. The lubrication from this mix is definitely not as good as what I was getting from SG; however, there is some lubrication, the stones have stayed fairly clean so far, and I haven’t had any issues with stone loosening.
If my experiments continue successfully, I’ll have my answer and a workable process.
As somebody with advanced terminal cancer, there will be dark days when I complain about things you say for no apparent reason. Please consider this my apology in advance for such times. There will be days that what I say is clearly wrong, making no sense: on these days I will often be argumentative. Please do not "let me slide" at such times, but rather call me out, point out what is factually wrong, and demand I explain my position. Please also consider this my apology in advance for such times.
-
AuthorPosts