I spent some time yesterday conducting various tests, to see if I could find a good way to tell the difference between the two stones. I’ll spare the details, but while it’s possible that the stones may be switched in some cases, the short answer is, I think the stones are so close together that it’s hard to tell them apart. Add to that, if a new 1000 stone has a few errant diamonds that are larger, it could give the impression that it’s rougher than the 800. Broken in, they seem a bit different, but they’re still pretty close.
Obviously, if you’re getting finer results from the 800, then use them in reverse. I’d pay attention to the results,,, over time it may change as the stones wear in.
As a suggestion, I wonder if a bit finer stone, like a 1200, is available? This might show a better progression, especially if the 1200/1600 ceramics aren’t available. Maybe the 1000 is a little to close to the 800? Just a thought.
Thanks Curtis.
Like I said, I’m confused.
But if everyones stones feel coarser on the 800 side, then I best go with it.
If I buy another set, then I will get that confirmation myself.
Currently my investment in the WEPS has cost AU$755 (incl freight) with the new arms and angle guage to come, possibly followed soon by some strops etc.
At least I can progress past the 800/1000’s to the 1200/1600’s and/or the MicroFine ceramics (I have them) and all is forgotten. 😉
Thanks for your helpful reply.
Starting to feel like I’m whinging now. :huh:
.
